Pubdate: Sun, 28 Nov 2010
Source: Washington Post (DC)
Page: A03
Copyright: 2010 Los Angeles Times
Contact: http://mapinc.org/url/mUgeOPdZ
Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/491
Author: John Hoeffel
Cited: Drug Policy Alliance http://www.drugpolicy.org/
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115 (Cannabis - California)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Proposition+19
Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/find?272 (Proposition 19)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?214 (Drug Policy Alliance)

CALIF. POT PROPONENTS GIRD FOR 2012

LOS ANGELES - Despite Proposition 19's loss at the polls this month, 
marijuana-legalization advocates in California are already working on 
their comeback plan for 2012 and are almost giddy about their prospects.

They see the election as a trial run that could lead to a campaign 
with a better message, a tighter measure and more money.

Both the winning and losing sides say California's voters rejected 
this specific initiative but remain open to legalizing the easily 
obtainable drug.

The proponents have a huge head start compared with where they were 
two years ago. At that time, regulating and taxing marijuana was the 
dream of a handful of Oakland activists.

Now, the campaign has a broader base of supporters, including labor 
and civil rights leaders. Big-money donors have shown a keen 
interest. And the state's electorate and media have seriously debated 
the issue.

In addition, the presidential election is expected to draw far more 
young voters to the polls. If they had shown up Nov. 2, supporters 
say, Proposition 19 might have come close to passing.

Even so, they also point out with amusement, legalization outpolled 
Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina.

"The question about legalizing marijuana is no longer when, it's no 
longer whether, it's how," said Ethan Nadelmann, the executive 
director of the Drug Policy Alliance, a national advocacy group that 
will play a pivotal role in any 2012 ballot measures in California 
and elsewhere. "There's a really strong body of people who will be 
ready to pull the lever in the future."

California voters rejected Proposition 19, 54 percent to 46 percent. 
But a post-election survey by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner found they 
favor legalization 49 percent to 41 percent, with 10 percent 
uncertain. And 52 percent said that marijuana laws, like alcohol 
prohibition, do more harm than good.

The consultants who ran the opposition campaign found that voters who 
were undecided were susceptible to arguments for legalizing 
marijuana. They also reacted negatively to "reefer madness" arguments 
that pot was inherently dangerous or a gateway drug. "Our best 
opportunity to beat it was on the merits of 19 itself," said Wayne 
Johnson, the strategist for the No on 19 campaign. Bankrolling the campaign

A key issue for legalization supporters in 2012 will be to find the 
money to run statewide television advertising. "The Yes campaign 
always has the burden of proof. We have to make the case that things 
should change," said Doug Linney, the strategist for the Yes on 19 campaign.

The campaign hoped to spend between $7 million and $15 million but 
brought in about $4 million. More than $1.5 million came from Richard 
Lee, the main proponent, who owns a medical marijuana dispensary, 
nursery and trade school in Oakland.

A few wealthy businessmen and young Silicon Valley entrepreneurs 
wrote sizable checks. "I think we found a lot of friends along the 
way that we will want to include from the get-go this time," Linney said.

A few days after the vote, Nadelmann told a conference on marijuana 
policy in Denver that the big donors who supported past measures 
would step up if the polls looked favorable. "They want to be in this 
to win," he said.

He noted that George Soros, the hedge-fund multibillionaire, donated 
$1 million to help Proposition 19 to clearly indicate his support for 
legalizing marijuana, and that Peter B. Lewis, a retired insurance 
company executive, has decided to focus his philanthropy on marijuana reform.

Lewis, who donated more than $218,000 to pass Proposition 19, paid 
for Greenberg Quinlan Rosner to poll California voters.

"Ballot measures are an option in 2012, but I can't speak to specific 
strategy at this time," Lewis said in a statement.

The next campaign in California will also start with a base of support.

The measure was backed as a job-creation plan by the state leadership 
of the Service Employees International Union and the United Food and 
Commercial Workers, but the unions were focused intensely on the 
races for statewide office.

The state NAACP and the Latino Voters League embraced Proposition 19 
as a way to end a drug war in which blacks and Latinos are arrested 
at much higher rates than whites, although the California exit poll 
showed both groups voted against the measure. 'Poised to win'

The campaign had also counted on young voters. Voters under 25 
supported Proposition 19 by two to one, but they did not turn out in 
big numbers.

The measure would have allowed adults 21 and older to grow and 
possess marijuana. "As a motivator, it was always a big question," 
Linney said. "I always thought myself it was a little overrated."

But Anna Greenberg with Greenberg Quinlan Rosner said that if young 
voters turn out in 2012 in numbers typical for presidential 
elections, legalization "is poised to win."

Legalization advocates are also rethinking the measure. A provision 
designed to protect people who smoke marijuana from discrimination 
was assailed by opponents who said it would prevent employers from 
firing stoned nurses or bus drivers. Speaking in Denver, Nadelmann 
said it might have to be sacrificed.

The Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll found that voters, by 50 percent to 
44 percent, think employers should be able to fire workers who test 
positive for marijuana even if they smoked it in their off hours.

The strongest message for Proposition 19, Linney said, was that it 
would control marijuana better than prohibition. But it allowed 
cities and counties to set the rules for marijuana sales and taxes, 
and opponents seized on that uncertainty to predict a chaotic 
patchwork of regulations.

Linney expects a vigorous debate among supporters over whether to 
keep a local approach. "That will be the central issue in drafting 
the next one," he said.

The Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll found that the issue splits voters, 
with 44 percent trusting city and county governments more to control 
marijuana, and 38 percent trusting the state more.

Johnson, the opposition strategist, said undecided voters seemed most 
intrigued by the promise that the measure would raise billions of 
dollars in tax revenue. But he said they became disillusioned when 
they learned there was no way to estimate how much would be raised.

"When that went away," he said, "they went away."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake